Chrisy58’s Weblog


National Socialism explained
September 15, 2008, 5:24 pm
Filed under: White Nationalist | Tags: ,

I asked a question of what form of government White Nationalists believed in. Someone answered National Socialism so now I am studying what National Socialism really is. I found these clips so I am posting them here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gx5KhoKYqKQ
National Socialism explained #1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQyFeqfINUs&feature=related
National Socialism explained #2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ejf3-ghQIEw&feature=related
National Socialism explained #3


5 Comments so far
Leave a comment

NS is a great form of government, it worked in Germany and would still work if it wasnt constantly manipulated by the media, the only prerequisites for that form of government are an educated population and an elevated sense of patriotism.

As I said NS and the Nazis are not the evil warmongers they show us every day on TV and such….manipulation, always look at both sides of the equation.

NS is not about hate, its not about killing jews, its about purity, equality and a deeper understanding of our roots

Comment by Ducker

Dear Ducker,

Thank you for your well thought out and well written comments.

You last sentence is really interesting to me. ” NS is not about hate, its not about killing jews, its about purity, equality and a deeper understanding of our roots”

What does the word purity mean to you? The dictonary I have in front of me has purity is of state of being pure, freedom from dirt or foreign matter, freedom from impure things, absence of admixture and to purify yourself from all that is unclean.

Now we look up the word purify and it says to free oneself from sin and defilement.

So NS is about keeping the White Race free from defilement of any other race is the way I would read that. To only want the best genes to produce offspring so that you can keep your race pure.

So those of us who don’t live up to the standards set because you want to keep your race pure are rooted out. Is the way I would understand it.

Who sets the standard of what is pure in NS? What happens to those people who do not meet the standard of being good enough or pure enough to meet the standards set?

What does Equality mean to you? Do you include women in your fight for equality? Or do you consider women are only to do certain roles and those roles center around the home and family? Do you feel women should receive the same chances of a good education as a man? Will NS join the fight for women’s rights?

My experience with White Nationalism is that women are restricted to very limited roles. That women who have strong opinions are branded as evil feminists who want to destroy White manhood. That is not the case I can assure you. Most women love men and want to see their man succeed and want to help him achieve his goals, but at the same time we want to be treated as an equal human beings with the same rights a man has. We don’t want to be looked upon as being lesser human beings because we are women.

Not all women can have babies. Not all women find the right man to marry, and some women are intelligent and want to work and some women manage to do both with great success. Yet to hear the WN talk, women are evil feminists who want to destroy families, their manhood, and society. Some of you don’t think women should vote, because you think we vote Democratic and Liberal. Some in the WN ranks say women are easily misled and fall victim to lies and so we are fooled into voting for people who are out to destroy America. So for the good of the White Nation women should not be allowed to vote.

I don’t see NS is fighting for equality of women. Women’s rights doesn’t seem to be in the plattform of NS, but actually women are considered 2nd class citizens. The more children they have the more they are valued in the NS/WN society. Hitler had the motherhood medal. Where any women who had 3 or more children received.

I know people will twist my words around and say I am anti children and family, whereas I love children and I believe in strong families.

The last thing you say is it leads to a deeper understanding of our roots. I am all for tracing back the family tree. We have done that in our family and I think everyone should know who their ancestors were and their history. Yet, one thing I have noticed within WN circles is that people claim credit for things that they are not a part of.

I personally am Celtic background. I have no Russian blood running through me, though I have always found Russian History interesting. I have no ties to Russia. Yet, to many White Nationalists they claim the whole white race as their ancestors and people.

I may not be explaining this thought very well. White Nationalists claim the they are one White Race and they have more in common with a White Russian in Russia than they do with a Hispanic American in America who shares the same values. Their slogan is White Pride World Wide. The American who is white (German, Scottish, English) for example, who has never been to Russia in his entire life, but has lived in let say Virginia his whole life thinks as a WN that he has more in common with his White Russian brother because they have the same color of skin. That is a myth and not the truth. The truth is that he would have more in common with a Black American who was raised in America and for the most part share the same values than he would with a White Russian who reflects the values of his country. That White Russian has more in common with a Russian who is not white than with you a White American. I just think that it is a pipe dream to think that you will achieve White Pride World Wide and you will have this one big homeland that all White people are one regardless of the nation they are living in.

Comment by chrisy58

National Socialism worked? It turned Germany into a smoking crater. Germany was indeed aggressive during WWII, and this was primarily because of an economic policy that drove them to war. Had they not gone to war, Germany would have been economically broke by about 1941. The war allowed them to re-coop losses spent on public works via “occupation taxes” and slave labor.

National Socialism is a type of petit bourgeosie ideology- that is it appeals to the middle class. The problem with that middle class is that while their real interests are more in line with that of the proletariat, they often don’t realize this so readily. In the case of Nazi Germany, the NSDAP was able to get large middle class appeal, but after their victory the big industrialists got total control. In private letters Goebbels admitted to concerned capitalists that the party’s left wing rhetoric was simply that and nothing more. No surprise seeing as how the NSDAP was a rather obscure fringe party until they were able to secure funds from major industrialists. Naturally, big capitalists do not fund movements which are categorically opposed to their interests.

The Third Reich wrought destruction on Europe, with their brutal bombings of Warsaw, Rotterdam, and Belgrade. Several million people were executed for spurious reasons. In the Soviet Union alone 8 million civilians were murdered, and hundreds of villages were razed. Often times these civilians died simply because their food and shelter were taken by the German Wehrmacht. Under orders from Hitler, they were given free reign to do so. Perhaps more disturbing was the Third Reich’s support for fanatical nationalists and their tendancy to play various groups off against one another- seeing that the legacy of this policy has left scars which still exist today. This is ironic because these national rivalries often shatter WNs’ dreams of pan-Europeanism.

American WNs’ willingness to believe tall tales about the Third Reich told by its handful of admirers in Europe stems primarily from profound ignorance of what actually happened in WWII. Nazi Germany was an oppressive, aggressive imperialist state. They went to war because they wanted to, and by their own policies they had to. It wasn’t the British that made them, it wasn’t the Jews or Communists or anyone else. Anyone who read Mein Kampf can see that Hitler had no qualms about imperialism, and that he aspired for a contiguous German land empire in Europe devoid of non-German ethnic minorities. This policy was later revealed in Poland and later in the Soviet Union. Moreover, Hitler reveals in Mein Kampf his belief in the German cause of WWI, again demonstrating that he was pro-imperialist and felt perfectly fine about attacking and invading other European nations.

National Socialism exists in many forms, some not so aggressive. But in the end the principle claims of NS are false. That is the claim that the biological or ethnic nation is everything and the classes must work together for the mutual good. This sounds great on paper, but scratch the surface and you see that in such nations, the working class does all the dirty work while the ruling class gets all the benefit- in other words the scales aren’t even. The only difference between this type of state and a liberal democracy is that under the NS or Fascist state, the workers have no ability to challenge this exploitive relationship.

Comment by Aslan Maskhadov

Russian professor igor panarin has stated that ethnic tensions brought about by a economic crises will to a U.S. civil war in fall of 09. I hope hes right. I may have the same culture as the black but i dont like them. FREE DIXIE 09!

Comment by jt ray

Russian intelligentsia today is more or less worthless. What Panarin doesn’t understand is that if America breaks up due to ethnic tension- unlikely- it will be some years after Russia does first. He is really an idiot for acting as though America’s multi-ethnic society is some how a nation-killer; Russia itself is an extremely multi-ethnic society.

Comment by Aslan Maskhadov




Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>