<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Banned in the USA?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrisy58.wordpress.com/2008/07/30/banned-in-the-usa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrisy58.wordpress.com/2008/07/30/banned-in-the-usa/</link>
	<description>My Journal of Thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BLACKLISTED DICTATOR</title>
		<link>http://chrisy58.wordpress.com/2008/07/30/banned-in-the-usa/#comment-3104</link>
		<dc:creator>BLACKLISTED DICTATOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisy58.wordpress.com/?p=1307#comment-3104</guid>
		<description>The Freedom of Expression Institute is calling upon Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Aziz Pahad to intervene on Prof Adam Habib&#039;s behalf regarding the refusal to give him a US entry visa. Although it appears to be based on the notion that Habib might be involved in terrorist activities, The FXI believes that the real reason is that Habib is a leading Muslim South African critic of US foreign policy.

However, it seems strange to exclude Prof Adam Habib on either basis when President Ahmadinejad was recently given entry and a platform to speak at Colombia University.

Perhaps the real reason is more complicated. Prof Adam Habib has been influential in moulding South Africa&#039;s foreign policy and this might be why The US has decided to exclude him from their shores. Following this logic, the US might, in fact, be informing South Africa that it does not, like most of the western world, approve of its close links to Iran and Hamas. After all, Minister of Intelligence, Ronnie Kasrils has recently done his best to foster good relations with these regimes on visits both to Tehran and Gaza. 

Pretoria has inevitably made enemies in Washington and, like it or not, Prof Adam Habib has paid the price. It might be that The US believes that Habib has indirectly used his position of prominence within South Africa to endorse or espouse terrorist activity, emanating from Iran and Hamas, and as a result should be excluded.

Of course it would be wrong to fall for The FXI&#039;s argument that this issue is really all about freedom of expression. The FXI is, once again, following a narrow political agenda; it recently backed Prof Abib as a nominee for The SABC&#039;s board and it is evident that The FXI implicitly supports Prof Habib&#039;s foreign policy ideas.

Would The FXI come to my aid if I ever had an opportunity to apply for an Iranian visa in order to attend public meetings in Tehran criticizing Ahmadinejad&#039;s foreign policy? Would The FXI take the matter up with Aziz Pahad? And if I ever actually gained accessed to such forums (non-existent!) in Iran, and inevitably ending up in a Tehran Jail, would Jane Duncan and Na&#039;eem Jeenah of The FXI fight at the highest levels for my release ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Freedom of Expression Institute is calling upon Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Aziz Pahad to intervene on Prof Adam Habib&#8217;s behalf regarding the refusal to give him a US entry visa. Although it appears to be based on the notion that Habib might be involved in terrorist activities, The FXI believes that the real reason is that Habib is a leading Muslim South African critic of US foreign policy.</p>
<p>However, it seems strange to exclude Prof Adam Habib on either basis when President Ahmadinejad was recently given entry and a platform to speak at Colombia University.</p>
<p>Perhaps the real reason is more complicated. Prof Adam Habib has been influential in moulding South Africa&#8217;s foreign policy and this might be why The US has decided to exclude him from their shores. Following this logic, the US might, in fact, be informing South Africa that it does not, like most of the western world, approve of its close links to Iran and Hamas. After all, Minister of Intelligence, Ronnie Kasrils has recently done his best to foster good relations with these regimes on visits both to Tehran and Gaza. </p>
<p>Pretoria has inevitably made enemies in Washington and, like it or not, Prof Adam Habib has paid the price. It might be that The US believes that Habib has indirectly used his position of prominence within South Africa to endorse or espouse terrorist activity, emanating from Iran and Hamas, and as a result should be excluded.</p>
<p>Of course it would be wrong to fall for The FXI&#8217;s argument that this issue is really all about freedom of expression. The FXI is, once again, following a narrow political agenda; it recently backed Prof Abib as a nominee for The SABC&#8217;s board and it is evident that The FXI implicitly supports Prof Habib&#8217;s foreign policy ideas.</p>
<p>Would The FXI come to my aid if I ever had an opportunity to apply for an Iranian visa in order to attend public meetings in Tehran criticizing Ahmadinejad&#8217;s foreign policy? Would The FXI take the matter up with Aziz Pahad? And if I ever actually gained accessed to such forums (non-existent!) in Iran, and inevitably ending up in a Tehran Jail, would Jane Duncan and Na&#8217;eem Jeenah of The FXI fight at the highest levels for my release ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy Baker</title>
		<link>http://chrisy58.wordpress.com/2008/07/30/banned-in-the-usa/#comment-2431</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisy58.wordpress.com/?p=1307#comment-2431</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m absolutely interested in reading more from you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m absolutely interested in reading more from you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
